<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CTPDC Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk</link>
	<description>Issues in Counselling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:29:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Concept of the Human and Counselling Part III</title>
		<link>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=84</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=84#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dolores James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Therapies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actualising tendency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congruence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counselling process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics in counselling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gestalt Therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transactional analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconditional positive regard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The theoretical inconsistencies discussed in the previous two posts (here and here) inevitably leave practicing counsellors in a difficult position. If they followed the theoretical frameworks as these are posited, they would not be able to counsel people. In transactional &#8230; <a href="http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=84">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=84</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The concept of the human and counselling – Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=79</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=79#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dolores James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Concept of Human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concept of human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counselling theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[importance of activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inconsistencies in counselling theories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The exclusion of practical activity is the major source of the theoretical incoherence in counselling theories because without it they cannot answer two fundamental questions: how do we know things and ourselves and how do we know if our knowledge &#8230; <a href="http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=79">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=79</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The concept of the human and counselling &#8211; Part I</title>
		<link>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=69</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=69#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dolores James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Concept of Human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Therapies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counselling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics in counselling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gestalt Therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[person-centred counselling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transactional analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the counselling approaches are quite explicit about their concept of the human, some are shyer, but either way without the concept of the human, no counselling approach can exist. The logical/theoretical frameworks of the approaches are driven by &#8230; <a href="http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=69">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=69</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Violence in videogames &#8211; aggression in children?</title>
		<link>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=32</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=32#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dolores James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aggression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Therapy Today]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did not want to post about another Therapy Today article. However, in the October 2011 issue there was a viewpoint article, accompanied again by an endorsing and highly superficial editorial. Both were intellectually so sloppy that I felt I &#8230; <a href="http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=32">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=32</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Therapy Today and the BACP Ethical Framework</title>
		<link>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=5</link>
		<comments>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=5#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dolores James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Questionable therapies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dubious therapies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hoffman Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research in counselling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Therapy Today]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ctpdc.co.uk/CTPDCBlog/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the issue of March 2010 of Therapy Today a viewpoint article was published – Anger and Forgiveness. The article was on the Hoffman Process and it said: “And I have yet to hear anyone rubbish it”. I wrote a &#8230; <a href="http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?p=5">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ctpdcblog.ctpdc.co.uk/?feed=rss2&#038;p=5</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

